Reposting of Theater Plus blog No. 269. Here’s another piece following the developing story at the time – the impending ban on obscenities in theater and other performance places. As I’ve said, it pretty much petered out without ever having any serious effect. However, I was reminded by my friend Anna Lengyel that it did have an impact on a touring Hungarian production at the time. Here is what Anna wrote to me a few days ago:
“I know for a fact that it did have an effect on the guest performance of Béla Pintér and Benedek Darvas’ brilliant work The Peasant Opera. They censored the hell out of its Russian subtitles, thereby castrating what the New York Times’ Charles Isherwood called “its bluntly vulgar humor that reveals the private pathologies behind the pretty myths of bucolic village life.”
Fortunately for all of us – aside from the eager beavers who closed shows or censored them before the law even took effect – this was a rare case of the law having any repercussions. (I repeat for the record: the hit film Leviathan also suffered – it was released right around July 1, 2014, with expletives crudely beeped out.) My photo above was taken the night in early June when the Meyerhold Center hosted an evening of satire and song in order to “say farewell” to obscenities in art as a law banning expletives prepares to take effect on July 1, 2014.
- By John Freedman
- June 22 2014 18:58
As we approach July 1, the day after which obscenities will officially be banned in Russian art, the Russian creative community is doing what it can to make sense of a concerted push on the part of the government to regulate the arts and artistic expression.
By writing the phrase “doing what it can” I am both honoring those who take the time and spend the effort to speak out, as well as pointing out the limits of what can be, and is being, done.
On Monday the Meyerhold Center will convene a discussion that will go far beyond the matter of banned language, and will take on the much-maligned state project, “The Foundations of State Cultural Policy.” This public event will feature statements from Vladimir Tolstoy, one of the authors of the government declaration about culture’s place in society, and from Alexander Rubinshtein, a member of the working group that is putting the declaration together.
Also expected to participate are representatives of Moscow theaters, journalists, students, government officials and other interested parties. According to Yelena Kovalskaya, art director at the Meyerhold, the complete transcript of the discussion will be published on the gazeta.ru site and on the working group’s official “discuss-the-project” site.
On Wednesday last week the Gogol Center hosted a public discussion featuring several prominent Moscow critics and cultural figures. Also participating, along with Gogol Center artistic director Kirill Serebrennikov, was the renowned Polish director Grzegorz Jarzyna. A video of the entire 90-minute event is posted on YouTube.
Earlier this month both the Playwright and Director Center, with performances of Alexander Pushkin’s “obscene” poetry, and the Meyerhold Center, with a satirical evening of performances featuring snippets from works that employ expletives, sought to stake out territory opposing increased government interference in artistic matters.
But despite these notable efforts, what we are not seeing is a mass movement. We are not seeing large numbers of individuals gathering to protest. We are not seeing big-name figures — whether artists or not — speak out against the creeping trend of censorship.
After all, as bizarre and absurd as it sounds, these efforts to regulate artistic expression come amidst a veritable barrage of other, frankly, unbelievable moves by the Russian government to control the habits and behavior of its citizens.
We all have fond memories of the suggestion by senators months ago to ban the import of women’s lace underwear. Last week another such law was proposed by more diligent lawmakers with nothing better to do — if they have their way, the import of sneakers and high-heeled shoes will be banned.
Then there is the law put forth last week by the State Duma’s Culture Committee that would ban the “unjustifiable” use of foreign words in Russian speech and writing.
As was pointed out by Ksenia Norall, a Facebook friend of mine, this law, had it existed in the 1860s, would have put a serious crimp in the working process of one Lev Tolstoy as he struggled to find the all-important first words of his novel “War and Peace.”
For those who have forgotten, allow me to quote the very first sentence of this novel, considered by many to be the greatest ever written: “Eh bien, mon prince. Genes et Lucques ne sont plus que des apanages, des pomestia, de la famille Buonaparte.”
Yes, the only Russian word in the first sentence of this great Russian novel is “pomestia,” or “estates.”
The critic and teacher Pavel Rudnev recently commented on current events on his Facebook wall: “State officials are doing everything in their power to radicalize art. To see that a counterculture ripens in damp basements. To ensure that young hooligans go ballistic from the hypocrisy of dandruffy, sanctimonious old men wagging their fingers at those who can do what old people can’t. So be it then, art will radicalize. Instead of growing more subtle and becoming more varied, it will become more aggressive and will attract aggression.”
Indeed, it is a sight to behold — the Russian government machine encouraging and unleashing forces of deadly violence in and against the former “brotherly neighbor” of Ukraine, while threatening at home to take away citizens’ lace underwear, high-heeled shoes, bad language and foreign words.
There is something terribly wrong with this picture and what it says about where Russia is headed. As I watch this circus play itself out, I keep thinking that no great satirist of the ilk of Mikhail Zoshchenko or Ilf and Petrov would have been capable of envisioning such nonsense.
Our great contemporary satirists, such as Viktor Shenderovich or Dmitry Bykov, are only able to respond to developments with quips and ripostes. As it turns out, brilliant as they are, they haven’t half the imaginative powers of Russian parliamentarians looking for still another joke law to top the last joke law. Shenderovich, for example, could recently do nothing but share someone else’s photo of a hip-looking young Russian man stomping on the American flag as he affectionately fondles his U.S.-made iPhone.
But that, in fact, is precisely where we are headed — into a world of impossible contrasts, filled with mixed, mutually-exclusive messages and the complete breakdown of meaning in our words, our images and our actions.
Listen to this, if you think I’m overstating it: Even as the ban against expletives in art is set to go into place, the Russian constitution still proclaims that censorship itself is banned.
Praise be to Rudnev for seeing in all this a positive sign. As the counterproductive and counterintuitive efforts of the Russian state continue to pile up, we can expect a new counterculture eventually to lead us out of the darkness.
Okay, then. We’re waiting…
By the way: If you’re reading this in the United States and you are visited by the desire to gloat about Russia’s problems — don’t get me started… Don’t even think about it.